Use Cases

Product

August 19, 2025

Desk Sharing Company Agreement: Legally Compliant Implementation and Co-determination

8 min.

Illustration of a modern office workspace featuring a digital desk booking system, check-in button, and a discussion between the manager and the works council, with icons for rights and co-determination in the background.
Illustration of a modern office workspace featuring a digital desk booking system, check-in button, and a discussion between the manager and the works council, with icons for rights and co-determination in the background.

The Key Insights

  • Operational agreements for desk sharing are required in codetermined areas according to § 87 BetrVG.

  • The Regional Labor Court Baden-Württemberg recognized partial codetermination obligations in 2024 regarding regulations on personal belongings and dual allocation of spaces.

  • A Clean Desk Policy and IT booking tools may trigger additional codetermination rights.

  • Early notification of the works council according to § 90 BetrVG is legally mandatory.

  • Case law continues to evolve - case-by-case examination remains crucial.

Betriebsvereinbarung herunterladen

Enter your email to receive the document.

Betriebsvereinbarung herunterladen

Enter your email to receive the document.

Betriebsvereinbarung herunterladen

Enter your email to receive the document.

What is Desk Sharing and when is a company agreement necessary?

Desk Sharing describes a modern office concept where employees do not have permanently assigned workspaces but instead share workstations based on availability. Typically, for example, there are 80 workstations available for 100 employees, with booking facilitated through digital systems. This flexibility allows companies to achieve significant cost savings on office space and energy expenses – on average, about 30%.

The question regarding a works agreement cannot be answered universally. What matters is whether the planned desk sharing model affects areas subject to the co-determination of the works council according to the Works Constitution Act. While the pure organization of workplaces is often classified as work behavior, accompanying measures like Clean Desk Policies or monitoring systems can trigger co-determination rights.

The topic is gaining importance especially in the context of New Work and hybrid working models. Many companies view flexible workspaces as a cornerstone of modern work culture, but they must consider the rights and needs of their employees.

Legal Foundations of Codetermination

The legal assessment of desk sharing concepts is primarily based on co-determination rights under the Works Constitution Act. It is important to distinguish between different circumstances that establish various rights and obligations.

§ 87 BetrVG: Order and conduct within the company

The central paragraph for company agreements on desk sharing is § 87 BetrVG. It grants the works council co-determination rights in various areas:

  • § 87 Subsection 1 No. 1 BetrVG: Co-determination on issues of workplace order and employee conduct. This involves what is known as conduct order, meaning rules for cohabitation in the workplace that don’t directly concern work performance. Typical examples are clean desk policies that regulate the handling of personal items at the workplace.

  • § 87 Subsection 1 No. 6 BetrVG: Co-determination in the introduction and use of technical facilities that serve to monitor behavior or performance. Digital booking systems for desk sharing may fall under this if they collect data on work behavior or attendance times.

  • § 87 Subsection 1 No. 7 BetrVG: Co-determination in health protection. This becomes relevant when changing workstations pose special requirements for ergonomics or risk assessments.

The distinction between co-determination-required conduct order and co-determination-free work behavior is often difficult in practice and is not uniformly assessed by the courts.

§ 90 BetrVG: Employer's duty to inform

Regardless of specific co-determination rights, § 90 BetrVG obliges the employer to inform the works council early and comprehensively—such as about planned changes in workplaces, workflows, or the work environment. This duty to inform already applies in the planning phase and is intended to give the works council the opportunity to make proposals to protect the employees.
If this obligation is disregarded, injunction claims may arise, which can significantly delay the implementation of a desk-sharing concept.

§ 111 BetrVG: Operational changes

According to the jurisprudence of the Federal Labor Court, the introduction of desk sharing is generally not considered an operational change within the meaning of § 111 BetrVG. The situation is different if desk sharing is part of a larger restructuring—such as in cases of massive space reductions or relocations.

In the event of operational changes, the works council is entitled to timely consultation and possibly to negotiate a reconciliation of interests or social plan. This is especially relevant when desk sharing is introduced as part of larger reorganization processes.

Co-Determination Areas in Desk Sharing

The case law shows that it is not the Desk Sharing concept as a whole that is subject to co-determination, but rather individual areas that need to be viewed differently. This insight is important for negotiations between employers and works councils.

Regulations on Personal Belongings

In 2024, the LAG Baden-Württemberg decided that regulations dealing with personal belongings in the workplace are subject to co-determination under § 87 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 BetrVG. This particularly affects Clean Desk Policies, which determine:

  • Which personal items are allowed to remain at the workplace

  • How private photos, plants, or personal items should be handled

  • Regulations for the storage and disposal of left-behind items

  • The provisioning and use of lockers or other storage options

These regulations pertain to employee behavior and have a direct impact on workplace dynamics. They go beyond simple work organization and therefore require a works agreement.

IT Booking Systems and Monitoring

Modern Desk Sharing systems, like anny, collect extensive data on workspace usage. If these systems are used to monitor employee behavior or performance, § 87 Abs. 1 Nr. 6 BetrVG applies. Co-determination is particularly required for:

  • Recording booking times and duration of presence

  • Analysis capabilities of individual usage patterns

  • Integration with other systems such as time tracking or access control

  • Automatic notifications or reminders

Data protection requirements under the GDPR intensify the need for clear regulations. Works agreements can serve as a legal basis for data processing and simultaneously protect the interests of employees.

Dual Use of Office Spaces

A particularly interesting aspect of the LAG Baden-Württemberg's decision concerns the dual use of office spaces. When areas are used both as workplaces and as break rooms or community areas, an overlapping usage arises that affects workplace dynamics.

This flexible use of offices requires regulations for:

  • Behavioral standards in multipurpose areas

  • Prioritizing competing claims of use

  • Noise levels and consideration in mixed zones

  • Cleaning and maintenance of flexible areas

The court saw this as a matter requiring co-determination since the type of space usage directly impacts the work environment and employee behavior.

Current Legal Judgments on Desk Sharing Works Agreements

The case law on desk sharing is evolving dynamically and reflects various assessments by labor courts. This development underscores the complexity of the topic and highlights the need for careful legal review in each individual case.

Regional Labor Court of Baden-Württemberg (2024): Partial Requirement of Co-Determination

The decision by the Regional Labor Court of Baden-Württemberg in October 2024 marks a significant milestone in desk sharing jurisprudence. The court evaluated a comprehensive desk sharing concept in detail and recognized different co-determination rights for various areas:

Areas Requiring Co-Determination:

  • Clean desk policy and regulations on personal belongings

  • Dual designation of office spaces as work and community areas

  • Technical monitoring possibilities through booking systems

Areas Free from Co-Determination:

  • General introduction of flexible workplaces

  • Technical equipment of workplaces

  • Pure work organization without behavioral guidelines

The court ordered the establishment of a conciliation committee for the disputed points, indicating that even with partial agreements, there can still be a need for clarification. This decision sets a precedent for similar cases and offers guidance for other companies.

Regional Labor Court of Düsseldorf: Introduction Free from Co-Determination

In another case, the Regional Labor Court of Düsseldorf assessed desk sharing as purely an aspect of employee behavior without the works council's co-determination rights. The court argued that the flexible use of workplaces is closely related to work performance and therefore falls within the employer's directive authority.

This case law demonstrates the differing assessment approaches of the courts and illustrates that the specific design of the desk sharing concept is crucial. While pure work organization is often free from co-determination, accompanying regulations may trigger co-determination rights.

Labor Court of Frankfurt: Involvement Required

The Labor Court of Frankfurt granted a works council interim legal protection and prohibited the introduction of desk sharing without prior involvement. This decision emphasizes the importance of information and consultation rights under § 90 BetrVG, even if there is no co-determination obligation.

This decision also highlights the practical risks for employers who fail to involve the works council in due time. Failure to do so can significantly delay projects and incur additional costs.

Content of a Desk Sharing Company Agreement

A legally compliant company agreement for desk sharing should cover all co-determination aspects while creating practical regulations for everyday work. The following areas have proven to be particularly important in practice.

Principles and Objectives

The first section of a company agreement should clearly define the company's desk sharing concept and state the goals pursued:

Definition and Scope:

  • Detailed description of the desk sharing model

  • Affected areas and departments

  • Exceptions for certain workplaces or employee groups

  • Relation to existing workplace regulations

Objectives:

  • Cost savings through efficient space utilization

  • Increasing flexibility for employees

  • Promoting teamwork among teams

  • Adaptation to hybrid work models

Balancing Interests:

  • Protection of employee interests

  • Consideration of special needs (severely disabled, pregnant women)

  • Ensuring ergonomic standards

  • Maintaining privacy and data protection

Workplace Distribution and Booking System

The technical implementation of desk sharing requires clear regulations on the booking procedure and workplace distribution:

Booking Procedure:

  • Available booking times and deadlines

  • Priority rules in case of bottlenecks

  • Cancellation options and deadlines

  • Procedures for technical problems

Workplace Equipment:

  • Standard equipment of all desk sharing workplaces

  • Ergonomic minimum standards

  • IT equipment and peripherals

  • Special equipment for specific needs

Special Regulations:

  • Long-term bookings for project work

  • Team workstations for group work

  • Quiet zones for focused work

  • Regulations for field staff

Clean Desk Policy and Orderly Rules

One of the most common points of contention in desk sharing company agreements are the regulations on handling personal belongings:

Tidying Duties:

  • Obligation for complete clearance when changing workplaces

  • Tolerated personal belongings during use

  • Handling of forgotten items

  • Cleaning and disinfection after use

Storage Options:

  • Provision of lockers or roll containers

  • Size and equipment of storage options

  • Access regulations and key management

  • Regulations for vacation time

Sanctions:

  • Warning in case of repeated violations

  • Temporary exclusion from desk sharing

  • Cost coverage for special cleanings

  • Escalation procedures in case of conflicts

Data Protection and Surveillance

The use of digital booking systems requires comprehensive data protection regulations:

Data Collection:

  • Type and scope of collected data

  • Purpose of data processing

  • Legal basis under GDPR

  • Storage duration and deletion deadlines

Evaluations and Controls:

  • Permissible statistical evaluations

  • Prohibition of individual performance assessments

  • Anonymization and pseudonymization

  • Rights of the affected individuals

Technical Security:

  • Protection against unauthorized access

  • Encryption and backup procedures

  • Logging of system accesses

  • Reporting procedure for data protection violations

anny as desk sharing software meets the highest data protection and security requirements.

Ergonomics and Occupational Safety

Flexible workplaces place special demands on occupational safety:

Risk Assessment:

  • Special assessment for desk sharing workplaces

  • Consideration of changing users

  • Regular review and adjustment

  • Documentation and evidence

Ergonomic Standards:

  • Height-adjustable desks and chairs

  • Adjustable monitors and lighting

  • Ergonomic input devices

  • Footrests and other aids

Training:

  • Introduction training for new desk sharing users

  • Regular refresher courses

  • Information about ergonomic settings

  • Contact person for problems

Negotiation Process and Conciliation Body

The success of a Desk Sharing implementation significantly depends on a constructive negotiation process between the employer and the works council. Early communication and transparent information can prevent many conflicts.

Preparation for Negotiations

Careful preparation is the key to successful negotiations:

Early Involvement:

  • Informing the works council already in the planning phase

  • Joint needs analysis and goal definition

  • Involvement in pilot projects and test phases

  • Regular consultations during development

Data Collection:

  • Employee surveys on acceptance

  • Analysis of current workplace usage

  • Benchmarking with other companies

  • Cost-benefit analyses

Legal Preparation:

  • Examination of co-determination obligations in the specific case

  • Analysis of comparable court decisions

  • Consultation with labor law specialists

  • Development of alternative regulatory approaches

Points of Contention and Compromise Solutions

In practice, similar conflict areas often emerge, for which proven compromise solutions exist:

Common Points of Contention:

  • Scope of the Clean Desk Policy

  • Data collection through booking systems

  • Exceptions for certain employee groups

  • Sanctions for rule violations

Proven Compromises:

  • Gradual introduction with evaluation phases

  • Flexible regulations for different areas

  • Trust-based working hours instead of strict control

  • Co-determination in system selection

Evaluation and Adjustment:

  • Regular review of the agreement

  • Adjustment options under changing conditions

  • Feedback procedures for employees

  • Joint success assessments

Arbitration Board as a Last Resort

If the employer and works council cannot reach an agreement, an arbitration board decides on the disputed points:

Requirements:

  • Failure of direct negotiations

  • Co-determined matter

  • Request by one of the parties

  • Formation of a parity arbitration board

Procedure:

  • Appointment of assessors by both sides

  • Selection of a neutral chairperson

  • Hearing of both parties

  • Binding ruling of the arbitration board

The costs of an arbitration board are substantial and the process is time-consuming. Therefore, all possibilities of an amicable solution should be exhausted before this route is taken.

Practical Implementation Without Works Council

Companies without a works council have more flexibility in designing desk sharing, but should still establish legally compliant regulations and consider the interests of their employees.

Employment Contract Regulations:

  • Inclusion of desk sharing clauses in employment contracts

  • Additional agreements for existing employment relationships

  • Clear rules on rights and obligations

  • Revocation reservations for adjustments

Voluntary Agreements:

  • Employee involvement in development

  • Voluntary participation in desk sharing

  • Regular feedback sessions

  • Adjustments based on experiences

Legally Compliant Documentation:

  • Written policies and procedures

  • Documentation of training

  • Proof of information on data protection

  • Logging of changes

Data Protection Aspects:

  • Consent of employees for data processing

  • Transparent information about data usage

  • Appointment of a data protection officer

  • Regular data protection impact assessments

Suitable Desk Sharing Software

Desk SHaring mit anny umsetzen

For the successful implementation of a desk sharing concept, a reliable and user-friendly software solution is crucial. anny offers a modern platform as desk sharing software that helps companies in the flexible management of their workplaces. With anny, employees can conveniently book available desks in real-time, optimizing the use of office spaces and increasing flexibility.

The software allows easy integration into existing IT infrastructures while taking into account important aspects like data protection and user-friendliness. Through features such as the display of workplace equipment, management of access rights, and support of clean desk policies, anny helps meet the requirements of works councils and employees.

Particularly advantageous are the clear booking processes and the ability to accommodate the individual needs of employees, such as by reserving ergonomic workplaces or special working areas. This way, anny not only supports efficient space utilization and cost savings but also enhances the well-being and productivity of employees within the framework of modern New Work concepts.

FAQ

Is it necessary for every company to establish a Desk Sharing Works Agreement?

No, a works agreement is only necessary if the desk sharing concept involves areas subject to the co-determination of the works council. This depends on the specific design - particularly on accompanying measures such as Clean Desk Policies or monitoring systems. Companies without a works council can generally introduce desk sharing independently but should consider legal aspects of employment.

Can the works council completely prevent the introduction of desk sharing?

The works council cannot fundamentally prevent the introduction of desk sharing, as the organization of work falls within the employer's right to direct. However, in areas requiring co-determination, they may demand a say and potentially bring about the involvement of a reconciliation board. In practice, constructive cooperation usually leads to acceptable compromises for all parties involved.

What role does company size play in co-determination?

The co-determination rights according to § 87 BetrVG apply regardless of company size, provided there is a works council. However, larger companies may be more frequently affected by co-determination rights due to more complex structures and extensive desk sharing concepts. The legal precedent is based on the specific design, not on the size of the business.

How long does the negotiation process for a works agreement take?

The duration strongly depends on the complexity of the desk sharing concept and the willingness to cooperate from both sides. Simple agreements can be completed in a few weeks, while complex projects may take several months. Involving a reconciliation board significantly extends the process - often by another 6-12 months.

What happens in case of violations of the works agreement?

Violations of works agreements can have legal consequences, as they act directly and mandatorily like collective agreements. Depending on the severity, warnings, dismissals, or claims for damages may follow. At the same time, employees have the right to enforce compliance with the agreed regulations and can assert this in court if the employer violates them.

anny US Inc. 2026
App Store Download for Room Management
Download from Google Play for Room Management
anny US Inc. 2026
App Store Download for Room Management
Download from Google Play for Room Management
anny US Inc. 2026
App Store Download for Room Management
Download from Google Play for Room Management